This debate has been going on for decades and the arguments are well-known. Systems are generally faster to erect, have higher load bearing and are neater in appearance. Amongst several disadvantages are cost, a lack of versatility and less ease of storage, transport and handling. iDent addresses all of these perceived disadvantages while adding some unique advantages of its own.

These days some clients, if for example access is required for external facade refurbishment, will specify a system for its neatness and flush outer surface. In reality, as long as the scaffold structure meets the client's requirements, then the type of scaffold is irrelevant. It comes down more to the preference of the scaffolding contractor. iDent gives the client all he is looking for:

• a safe method of works

• a scaffold suitable for the works to be undertaken

• working levels positioned at the exact height required and not restricted to those set by most system scaffolds.

• unimpeded access, with free walkways if required

• easy adaptions

• a neat appearance

• a flush finish outer face for external cladding and netting

iDent advantages:

• More cost-effective than a system

• Requires less yard/storage area than systems

• Uses existing transport (most systems require a crane-equipped vehicle to lift materials on and off efficiently)

• Less risk of back injury leaning forward/ over stillages to pick up system components while maintaining the benefit of an upright position when sliding tubes.

• Easier manual handling passing up and down during construction.

• No system-specific risk assessment and lifting techniques are to be considered and adopted to prevent injury.

• No wasted space on transporting vehicles, maximising the volume of material to reduce transport costs and environmental pollution.

• Minimal maintenance with fewer couplers than t&f

• More easily repairable components compared to a system